For research institutions
Technology evaluation, real-world observation and responsible publication.
Universities, academic medical centers and research groups interested in evaluating rehabilitation, assessment and documentation technologies.
Challenges
Frequent operational challenges
Common observations in this type of organization. These are not clinical claims or diagnoses.
Access to technology
Evaluating a device is difficult without coordinated access and manufacturer documentation.
Unclear source documentation
Specifications circulating commercially are often not traceable to an official source.
Publication expectations
Collaboration terms and publication independence need to be defined before work begins.
Ecosystem
Relevant technologies
Each area links to its verified page, with official source, verification date and content status.
Clinical research & collaboration
Framework for evaluation projects, real-world observation and responsible publication.
Rehabilitation robotics
RobotGym systems including UniGym, with manufacturer videos, declared functions and verified specifications.
Anovator body composition analyzers
Assessment technology across several models, with official specifications and comparison published in the hub.
AOR HealIQ
Documentation and follow-up platform presented in the hub; the platform itself operates separately.
Benefits
Potential operational benefits
Potential organizational and operational benefits. Clinical results are not guaranteed.
- Coordinated access to technologies for evaluation projects, subject to availability.
- Source-traceable specifications with published verification dates.
- Framework for real-world observation and co-design discussions.
- Responsible publication practices agreed in advance in writing.
Implementation
Implementation process
- 01
1. Scope conversation
Define the research question, setting, timeline and technology of interest.
- 02
2. Documentation review
Review of available official manufacturer documentation and open verification items.
- 03
3. Written agreement
Collaboration terms, responsibilities, data handling and publication expectations are agreed in writing. Ethics and IRB approvals remain the institution's responsibility.
- 04
4. Implementation and training
Installation, operator training and documented operating practices for the study setting.
- 05
5. Follow-up
Technical support during the project and coordination with the manufacturer when required.
Training & support
Training and post-sale support
Training
- Operator training for research staff on the specific equipment used.
- Documentation practices to keep measurement conditions consistent.
Post-sale support
- Single point of contact at AOR for service, parts and coordination with the manufacturer.
- Bilingual support in English and Spanish.
- Documented service requests through the AOR service channel, with status tracking.
- Warranty terms apply only as documented by the manufacturer for each product.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Does AOR publish clinical evidence?
AOR publishes only manufacturer-documented information. Any study results are published by the responsible institution under its own review process.
Who is responsible for ethics approval?
The research institution. AOR does not provide ethics, IRB or regulatory determinations.
Next step
Recommended next step
Open a scope conversation with the AOR team.
Technology evaluation, real-world observation and responsible publication.
Let's discuss your specific setting before any technology is proposed. No published pricing, no commitment.
Collaboration is subject to a written agreement. AOR does not guarantee study outcomes, does not provide ethics or IRB determinations, and does not publish clinical claims that are not documented by an official source.